4.6 Article

Enzymatic activities of human cytomegalovirus maturational protease assemblin and its precursor (pPR, pUL80a): Maximal activity of pPR requires self-interaction through its scaffolding domain

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 81, 期 8, 页码 4091-4103

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02821-06

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI013718, AI13718, R56 AI013718, AI32957, R01 AI032957] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herpesviruses encode an essential, maturational serine protease whose catalytic domain, assemblin (28 kDa), is released by self-cleavage from a 74-kDa precursor (pPR, pUL80a). Although there is considerable information about the structure and enzymatic characteristics of assemblin, a potential pharmacologic target, comparatively little is known about these features of the precursor. To begin studying pPR, we introduced five point mutations that stabilize it against self-cleavage at its internal (1), cryptic (C), release (R), and maturational (M) sites and at a newly discovered tail (T) site. The resulting mutants, called ICRM-pPR and ICRMT-pPR, were expressed in bacteria, denatured in urea, purified by immobilized metal affinity chromatography, and renatured by a two-step dialysis procedure and by a new method of sedimentation into glycerol gradients. The enzymatic activities of the pPR mutants were indistinguishable from that of IC-assemblin prepared in parallel for comparison, as determined by using a fluorogenic peptide cleavage assay, and approximated rates previously reported for purified assemblin. The percentage of active enzyme in the preparations was also comparable, as determined by using a covalent-binding suicide substrate. An unexpected finding was that, in the absence of the kosmotrope Na2SO4, optimal activity of pPR requires interaction through its scaffolding domain. We conclude that although the enzymatic activities of assemblin and its precursor are comparable, there may be differences in how their catalytic sites become fully activated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据