4.4 Article

Antitumor activity of HER1/EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib, alone and in combination with CPT-11 (irinotecan) in human colorectal cancer xenograft models

期刊

CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 59, 期 5, 页码 651-659

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-006-0320-8

关键词

erlotinib; tarceva; HER1/EGFR; irinotecan; colorectal cancer; xenograft

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Erlotinib (Tarceva((R)), OSI-774) is a potent, orally available, small-molecule inhibitor of HER1/EGFR tyrosine-kinase activity. In this study, the antitumor activity of erlotinib was evaluated in two human colorectal tumor xenograft models (LoVo and HCT116) in athymic mice. When erlotinib was administered as monotherapy, significant tumor growth inhibition (TGI) was seen in the LoVo model at both 100 mg/kg [TGI > 100%, P < 0.001; 6/10 partial regressions (PRs)] and 25 mg/kg (TGI = 79%, P < 0.001) doses. However, the HCT116 xenograft model was not responsive to any dose of erlotinib tested. The differential response to erlotinib of these two tumor models was not a result of differences in HER1/EGFR expression levels since these were similar in both cell lines. However, it was demonstrated that resistance to erlotinib in the HCT116 model may be a result of persistent activation of ERK in these tumors. Based on the single agent activity of erlotinib in LoVo tumors, a combination study with CPT-11 (Camptosar((R)), irinotecan) was performed. CPT-11 at the optimal dose of 60 mg/kg or a lower dose of 15 mg/kg resulted in significant TGI (TGI > 100%, P < 0.001, and TGI = 93%, P < 0.001, respectively) in LoVo-bearing mice. Combination treatment with erlotinib (25 mg/kg) and CPT-11 (15 mg/kg) produced significantly greater antitumor activity (TGI > 100%, P < 0.001; 10/10 PRs) than either agent alone (P < 0.05), with no increase in toxicity. These data indicate that erlotinib can enhance the antitumor activity of CPT-11, without enhanced toxicity, in the LoVo human colorectal tumor xenograft model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据