4.6 Article

Mechanism of apoptosis induced by IFN-α in human myeloma cells:: Role of Jak1 and Bim and potentiation by rapamycin

期刊

CELLULAR SIGNALLING
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 844-854

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.10.009

关键词

multiple myeloma; interferon-alpha; Bim; mTOR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) has been used for the last 20 years in the maintenance therapy of multiple myeloma (MM), though it is only effective in some patients. Congruent with this, IFN-alpha induces apoptosis in some MM cell lines. Understanding the mechanism of IFN-alpha-induced apoptosis could be useful in establishing criteria of eligibility for therapy. Here we show that IFN-a-induced apoptosis in the MM cell lines U266 and H929 was completely blocked by a specific inhibitor of Jak1. The mTOR inhibitor rapamycin mitigated apoptosis in U266 but potentiated it in H929 cells. IFN-alpha induced PS exposure, Delta Psi(m) loss and pro-apoptotic conformational changes of Bak, but not of Bax, and was fully prevented by Mcl-1 overexpression in U266 cells. IFN-a treatment caused the release of cytochrome c from mitochondria to cytosol and consequently, a limited proteolytic processing of caspases. Apoptosis induced by IFN-a was only slightly prevented by caspase inhibitors. Levels of the BH3-only proteins PUMA and Bim increased during IFN-alpha treatment. Bim increase and apoptosis was prevented by transfection with the siRNA for Bim. PUMA-siRNA transfection reduced electroporation-induced apoptosis but had no effect on apoptosis triggered by IFN-alpha. The potentiating effect of rapamycin on apoptosis in H929 cells was associated to an increase in basal and IFN-alpha-induced Bim levels. Our results indicate that IFN-alpha causes apoptosis in myeloma cells through a moderate triggering of the mitochondrial route initiated by Bim and that mTOR inhibitors may be useful in IFN-alpha maintenance therapy of certain MM patients. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据