4.7 Article

Hematoma resolution as a target for intracerebral hemorrhage treatment:: Role for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ in microglia/macrophages

期刊

ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
卷 61, 期 4, 页码 352-362

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ana.21097

关键词

-

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [1 R01 NS052791, 1 R01 NS39378] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Phagocytosis is necessary to eliminate the hematoma after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH); however, release of proinflammatory mediators and free radicals during phagocyte activation is toxic to neighboring cells, leading to secondary brain injury. Promotion of phagocytosis in a timely and efficient manner may limit the toxic effects of persistent blood products on surrounding tissue and may be important for recovery after ICH. Methods: Intrastriatal blood injection in rodents and primary microglia in culture exposed to red blood cells were used to model ICH and to study mechanisms of hematoma resolution and phagocytosis regulation by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma) in microglia/macrophages. Results: Our study demonstrated that the PPAR gamma agonist, rosiglitazone, promoted hematoma resolution, decreased neuronal damage, and improved functional recovery in a mouse ICH model. Microglia isolated from murine brains showed more efficient phagocytosis in response to PPAR gamma activators. PPAR gamma activators significantly increased PPAR gamma-regulated gene (catalase and CD36) expression, whereas reducing proinflammatory gene (tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1 beta, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and inducible nitric oxide synthase) expression, extracellular H2O2 level, and neuronal damage. Phagocytosis by microglia was significantly inhibited by PPAR gamma gene knockdown or neutralizing anti-CD36 antibody, whereas it was enhanced by exogenous catalase. Interpretation: PPAR gamma in macrophages acts as an important factor in promoting hematoma absorption and protecting other brain cells from ICH-induced damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据