4.8 Article

Selective use of multiple vitamin D response elements underlies the 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-mediated negative regulation of the human CYP27B1 gene

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 35, 期 8, 页码 2734-2747

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm179

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human 25-hydroxyvitamin D-3 (25(OH) D3) 1 alpha-hydroxylase, which is encoded by the CYP27B1 gene, catalyzes the metabolic activation of the 25(OH) D3 into 1 alpha, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1a, 25(OH) D-2(3)), the most biologically potent vitamin D3 metabolite. The most important regulator of CYP27B1 gene activity is 1 alpha,25(OH)(2)D-3 itself, which down-regulates the gene. The down-regulation of the CYP27B1 gene has been proposed to involve a negative vitamin D response element (nVDRE) that is located similar to 500 bp upstream from transcription start site (TSS). In this study, we reveal the existence of two new VDR-binding regions in the distal promoter, 2.6 and 3.2 kb upstream from the TSS, that bind vitamin D receptor -retinoid X receptor complexes. Since the down regulation of the CYP27B1 gene is tissue-and cell-type selective, a comparative study was done for the new 1 alpha, 25(OH) D-2(3)-responsive regions in HEK-293 human embryonic kidney and MCF-7 human breast cancer cells that reflect tissues that, respectively, are permissive and nonpermissive to the phenomenon of 1 alpha, 25(OH) D-2(3)-mediated down-regulation of this gene. We found significant differences in the composition of protein complexes associated with these CYP27B1 promoter regions in the different cell lines, some of which reflect the capability of transcriptional repression of the CYP27B1 gene in these different cells. In addition, chromatin architecture differed with respect to chromatin looping in the two cell lines, as the new distal regions were differentially connected with the proximal promoter. This data explains, in part, why the human CYP27B1 gene is repressed in HEK-293 but not in MCF-7 cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据