4.6 Article

Ultrahigh-temperature microwave annealing of Al+- and P+-implanted 4H-SiC

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 101, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.2717016

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, an ultrafast solid-state microwave annealing has been performed, in the temperature range of 1700-2120 degrees C on Al+- and P+-implanted 4H-SiC. The solid-state microwave system used in this study is capable of raising the SiC sample temperatures to extremely high values, at heating rates of similar to 600 degrees C/s. The samples were annealed for 5-60 s in a pure nitrogen ambient. Atomic force microscopy performed on the annealed samples indicated a smooth surface with a rms roughness of 1.4 nm for 5x5 mu m(2) scans even for microwave annealing at 2050 degrees C for 30 s. Auger sputter profiling revealed a < 7 nm thick surface layer composed primarily of silicon, oxygen, and nitrogen for the samples annealed in N-2, at annealing temperatures up to 2100 degrees C. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy revealed that this surface layer is mainly composed of silicon oxide and silicon nitride. Secondary ion mass spectrometry depth profiling confirmed almost no dopant in diffusion after microwave annealing at 2100 degrees C for 15 s. However, a sublimation of similar to 100 nm of the surface SiC layer was observed for 15 s annealing at 2100 degrees C. Rutherford backscattering spectra revealed a lattice damage-free SiC material after microwave annealing at 2050 degrees C for 15 s, with scattering yields near the virgin SiC material. Van der Pauw-Hall measurements have revealed sheet resistance values as low as 2.4 k Omega/square for Al+-implanted material annealed at 2100 degrees C for 15 s and 14 Omega/square for the P+-implanted material annealed at 1950 degrees C for 30 s. The highest electron and hole mobilities measured in this work were 100 and 6.8 cm(2)/V s, respectively, for the P+- and Al+-implanted materials. (c) 2007 American Institute of Physics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据