4.5 Article

Androgen receptor is essential for sexual differentiation of responses to olfactory cues in mice

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 25, 期 7, 页码 2182-2190

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05484.x

关键词

androgen insensitivity syndrome; disorders of sexual differentiation; sexual behavior; sexual orientation; testicular feminization

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH57759, K02 MH01349] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During sexual differentiation males and females are exposed to different levels of testosterone, which promotes sex differences in the adult brain and in behavior. Testosterone can act after aromatization or reduction via a number of steroid hormone receptors. Here we provide new evidence that the androgen receptor (AR) is essential for sexual differentiation in mice. We used mice carrying the testicular feminization (Tfm) mutation of the AR. Adult Tfm males, wild-type male and female littermates were gonadectomized and given subcutaneous estradiol implants. In all sexually dimorphic traits, Tfm males had responses equivalent to females and different from males. In simultaneous choice tests, males spent significantly more time investigating female-soiled bedding, whereas females and Tfm males preferred to investigate male-soiled bedding. Tfm males and females did not have a partner preference in tests with awake stimulus animals, whereas males showed a preference for females over males. Exposure to male-soiled, but not clean, bedding produced a significant increase in c-Fos-immunoreactive cells in the medial preoptic area and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in Tfm males and females, no increase was noted in males. Masculine sexual behavior (mounting and thrusting) was not sexually dimorphic, and all groups displayed these behaviors. Our results support data collected in humans suggesting a role for the androgen receptor in sexual differentiation of social preferences and neural responses to pheromones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据