4.2 Article

Clinical phase I and pharmacology study of gemcitabine (2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine) administered in a two-weekly schedule

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 212-221

出版社

ESIFT SRL
DOI: 10.1179/joc.2007.19.2.212

关键词

gemcitabine; solid tumors; difluorodeoxycytidine; gemcitabine pharmacokinetics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gemcitabine (dFdC) was tested in a Phase I trial at 14 doses (40-5700 mg/m(2)), administered every 2 weeks as a 1/2 -h infusion to 52 patients with refractory solid cancer. Gemcitabine and its deaminated metabolite difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU), measured with HPLC, reached plasma peak levels of 2-3 mu M at 40 mg/m(2) which increased to 512 mu M at 5700 mg/m(2). Gemcitabine was eliminated rapidly with a t1/2 beta of 2.3-15.8 min in the 40-5700 mg/m(2) dose range, with one exception of 38 min at 4500 mg/m(2). dFdU was still present at a plateau of 20 mu M from 4-24 h at doses >960 mg/m(2). Up to 3650 mg/m(2) linear pharmacokinetics were observed for gemcitabine, while those for dFdU were linear over the whole range. Gemcitabine clearance varied between 1.5-12.6 l/min and was 1.5-fold higher in males than in females (p= 0.024); its volume of distribution was 45.2-248 l. In lymphocytes peak levels of the active metabolite dFdCTP were 100-380 pmol/10(6) cells in the first course. Apparently a plateau was reached which was confirmed by incubation of white blood cells with increasing gemcitabine concentrations up to 500 mu M, reaching a plateau of about 350 pmol/10(6) cells; in contrast in cancer cells this concentration dependence did not exist and accumulation reached about 1590 pmol/10(6) cells. In tumors isolated from patients treated with gemcitabine dFdCTP reached about 70 pmol/g wet weight. Gemcitabine itself was eliminated only to a limited extent in the urine, but dFdU was eliminated almost completely in the urine in the first 24 h (51-92%). In conclusion, dFdC was rapidly eliminated in contrast to dFdU, which was present for at least 18 h, as well as dFdCTP in lymphocytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据