Comparison of pulse shape discrimination methods for phoswich and CsI:T1 detectors

Comparison of four pulse shape discrimination (PSD) methods was performed on the same digitized pulses from two different detector configurations. Beta/gamma discrimination of Sr-90 and Cs-137 was performed using a phoswich detector made of BC400 and BGO scintillators. Alpha/gamma discrimination of 2 (10)P0 and Cs-137 was performed using a CsI:TI scintillation crystal. The pulse waveforms were digitized with a DGF-4C and analyzed offline with IGOR Pro software. The four pulse shape discrimination methods that were compared include: constant fraction discrimination (CFD), rise time discrimination (RTD), constant time discrimination (CTD), and charge comparison (CC). The CTD method resulted in a spillover of 9.2% (Figure of Merit, FOM = 3.9) and 0.25% (FOM = 3.2), while the CC method resulted in a spillover of 9.9% (FOM = 3.3) and 0.033% (FOM = 3.7) for the phoswich and CsI:TI detectors, respectively. Although the CTD results in the lowest spillover for high signal-to-noise pulses, the optimized CC method, as e best PSD method overall. implemented here, appears to be the, Analysis of the reciprocal of the pulse shape data typically resulted in a significantly higher FOM than conventional methods with no reduction in spillover. This simple mathematical transformation of the pulse shape data illustrates that the FOM may not be a good scheme for the quantification of PSD.