4.6 Article

Satisfaction with quality of life poststroke:: Effect of sex differences in pain response

期刊

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.12.022

关键词

pain; quality of life; rehabilitation; sex; stroke

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [K02 AG019736, R01 AG024806, R01 AG024806-02] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [K01 HD046682-05, K01 HD046682] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To study the relationship between sex differences among men and women in the response to pain and the effect on satisfaction with quality of life (QOL) in poststroke patients approximately 90 days after discharge from inpatient medical rehabilitation. Design: Cross-sectional design. Setting: Community based. Participants: The sample included 1724 patients (877 men, 847 women) aged 40 years and older with a history of stroke, according to information obtained from the IT HealthTrack database. The average age was 68.7 years; 79.3% were non-Hispanic white. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: Satisfaction with QOL. Results: Pain ratings for both the men and the women were significant and inversely associated with satisfaction with QOL after adjustments for possible confounding factors. However, among men with stroke, each 1-point increase in pain rating was associated with an 18% decreased odds of being satisfied with QOL (odds ratio [OR],.81; 95% confidence interval [CI],.77-86). Conversely, among women with stroke, each 1-point increase in pain rating was associated with an 11% decreased odds of being satisfied with QOL (OR=.89; 95% CI, .84-95). Conclusions: Our data indicate that pain after stroke is significantly associated with reduced satisfaction with QOL, particularly among men. Increased awareness and treatment of pain may improve satisfaction with QOL. Our findings suggest that sex differences and pain response are clinically important factors in examining satisfaction with QOL in the poststroke population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据