4.6 Article

Sedimentary processes in the Thau Lagoon (France):: From seasonal to century time scales

期刊

ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
卷 72, 期 3, 页码 534-542

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2006.11.019

关键词

Thau Lagoon; sedimentation; bioturbation; X-ray; grain size; lead-210; beryllium-7; thorium-234

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a part of the MICROBENT programme, an investigation of the sedimentation framework was carried out at the water-sediment interface in the Thau Lagoon (French Mediterranean coast). Two main sites, C4 in the middle of the lagoon and C5 near oyster farms, were visited six times between December 2001 and May 2003. Interface sediments were studied using classical sedimentology parameters (radiography RX, grain size distribution) and analysis of selected radionuclides (Th-234, Be-7, Pb-210, Ra-226). On a century time scale, excess Pb-210 (Pb-210(xs)) presents classical profiles with an upper mixed layer, followed by an exponential decrease of activities to undetectable levels below 20 - 30 cm. At the central site, C4, cores seem to register episodic changes in mean grain size, presenting recurrently peaks. The upper 10 cm of Pb-210(xs) profiles at site C5 exhibit a mixed layer associated with coarser sediments: this could be related to biological activity. Sedimentation rates derived from Pb-210(xs) varied from 0.15 cm y(-1) at the edge of the basin, to 0.25 cm y(-1) at the central site. On a seasonal time scale, Th-234 and Be-7 both show significant variations in activities and in penetration within the sediment. Bioturbation rates derived from both radionuclides agree well and range between 1-10 cm(2) y(-1) at site C4 and 1-31 cm(2) Y-1 at site C5. (234) Th and Be-7 fluxes at the water-sediment interface show too seasonal variations, more pronounced for site C5. This latter site presents especially a higher variability that is well marked with season, probably in relation with its position near oyster farms. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All fights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据