4.7 Article

Evaluating the effects of embodied energy in international trade on ecological footprint in China

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
卷 62, 期 1, 页码 136-148

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.007

关键词

embodied energy; ecological footprint; international trade; sustainable development; input-output analysis; energy intensity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on sub-sectoral level of economy and detailed traded items, embodied energy (EE) in international trade flow in China is estimated during 1996-2004, and the effects of EE on sustainability are quantified by using one of the most popular indicators-Ecological footprint (EF). A framework of EF method, which is more relevant to realism of specific country, is proposed in this paper. The results show that China is a net importer of EE during the period covered by this study except for the year from 1997 to 1999. Imported, Exported and Net imported EE tends to increase sharply along time series. Net imported energy would increase 38% and energy consumption would increase 2.8% in 2004 if EE were taken into account. Footprint(energy) is the most important part of EF components and is significantly affected by EE, and the effects of EE on EF are similar to that of Footprint(energy). Footprint(energy), EF and ecological deficit of 2004 will be underestimated about 2.92%, 1.36%, 2.83%, respectively, if EE is not taken into the national energy budget. Continuous increase of EF and ecological deficit along time series indicates that China is moving away from sustainability. 1.47 times Chinese territories are accurately occupied by China in 1996 while 1.71 times in 2004. Obviously unsustainability procedure of China is accelerated by EE. The contribution of EE to EF and ecological deficit is small in absolute terms expressed in per capita, but the effects on whole nation are huge if the population of China multiplies them. To curb the increase of EF and ecological deficit and to achieve the goal of sustainability, some policy and measures are also proposed. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据