4.1 Article

Age and gender effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ramelteon, a hypnotic agent acting via melatonin receptors MT1 and MT2

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 47, 期 4, 页码 485-496

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0091270006298602

关键词

insomnia; ramelteon; CYP1A2; pharmacokinetics; pharmacodynamics; age; gender

资金

  1. NCCIH NIH HHS [AT-01381] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG-17880] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDA NIH HHS [DA-13209, DA-05258, DA-13834] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-58496] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effects of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ramelteon, a hypnotic acting via binding to melatonin MT1 and MT2 receptors, were evaluated in healthy young (18-34 years) and elderly (63-79 years) volunteers. Part 1 evaluated the pharmacokinetics of open-label oral ramelteon, 16 mg. Part 2 was a double-blind, randomized, 2-trial crossover pharmacodynamic study of 16-mg ramelteon and matching placebo. Ramelteon clearance was significantly reduced in elderly vs young volunteers (384 vs 883 mL/min/kg, P < .01) and half-life significantly increased (1.9 vs 1.3 h, P < .001). Gender did not significantly influence clearance or half-life. Ramelteon was extensively transformed to its hydroxylated M-II metabolite, with serum AUG values averaging about 30 times those of the parent drug. Compared to placebo, ramelteon increased self- and observer-rated sedation, but age and gender did not influence the magnitude of the ramelteon-placebo difference. Ramelteon did not significantly impair digit-symbol substitution test performance or impair information acquisition and recall. Thus, the reduced clearance and higher serum levels of ramelteon in elderly subjects were not associated with enhanced pharmacodynamic effects. The usually recommended clinical dose of ramelteon (8 mg) does not require modification based on age or gender.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据