3.9 Article

Inactivation of a subpopulation of human neutrophils by exposure to ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene wear debris

期刊

FEMS IMMUNOLOGY AND MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 49, 期 3, 页码 425-432

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2007.00222.x

关键词

human polymorphonuclear neutrophils; ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene wear particles; infections; Staphylococcus aureus; phagocytosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polymorphonuclear neutrophils, a first line of defence against invading microbial pathogens, may be attracted by inflammatory mediators triggered by ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear particles released from orthopaedic prostheses. Phagocytosis of UHMWPE particles by neutrophils may indirectly compromise their phagocytic-bactericidal mechanisms, thus enhancing host susceptibility to microbial infections. In an in vitro assay, pre-exposure of purified human neutrophils to UHMWPE micrometre- and submicrometre-sized wear particles interfered with subsequent Staphylococcos aureus uptake in a heterogeneous way, as assessed by a dual label fluorescence microscopic assay that discriminated intracellular rhodamine-labelled UHMWPE particles from fluorescein isothiocyanate-labelled S. aureus. Indeed, a higher percentage (44%) of neutrophils having engulfed UHMWPE particles lost the ability to phagocytize S. aureus, compared with UHMWPE-free neutrophils (< 3%). Pre-exposure of neutrophils to UHMWPE wear particles did not impair but rather stimulated their oxidative burst response in a chemoluminescence assay. The presence of UHMWPE wear particles did not lead to significant overall consumption of complement-mediated opsonic factors nor decreased surface membrane display of neutrophil complement receptors. In conclusion, engulfment of UHMWPE wear particles led to inactivation of S. aureus uptake in nearly half of the neutrophil population, which may potentially impair host clearance mechanisms against pyogenic infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据