4.2 Article

Impaired fronto-temporal processing of emotion in schizophrenia

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2007.04.001

关键词

social cognition; facial expression processing; event related potentials (ERPs); schizophrenia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims. - Abnormal emotion processing in schizophrenia affects social and functional outcome. Spatiotemporal brain mechanisms underlying this deficit are unclear. Materials and methods. - Event-related potential (ERP) responses to emotional and neutral face processing during an implicit (gender detection) and an explicit (expression detection) task were compared between a group of healthy volunteers (n = 10) and a group of patients with schizophrenia (n = 10). Results. - Whereas patients had normal primary visual cortex responses, the early modulation of occipital, temporal, and frontal responses by emotional expression observed in controls was absent in patients. The occipito- temporal N170 amplitude was reduced in patients relative to controls during expression detection, but not during gender detection. Frontal activity within 180-250 ms was reduced in patients compared to controls. As opposed to controls, no significant difference was seen in patients at the right temporal electrode (T6) between amplitudes of long-latency ERPs elicited by distinct emotions during the expression detection task. Conclusion. - In patients with schizophrenia, abnormal early extraction of expression-related information in the occipito-temporal cortex (before 170 ms) impairs structural encoding of facial expressions (N170) and may disrupt motivation- and task-dependent context processing (180-250ms time window) of expression-related facial features. Moreover, top-down neuro-modulation from frontal and limbic structures to visual occipito-temporal cortex may not be sufficient to optimize the extraction of expression-specific face features. (c) 2007 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据