4.7 Article

Plasma matrix metalloproteinase-9 level is better than serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 level to predict gastric cancer evolution

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 2054-2060

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2299

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in blood is a promising new tumor marker. The aims of the present study are to compare the usefulness of plasma and serum MMP-9 levels for predicting gastric cancer development, invasion, and survival. Experimental Design: In this nested case-control study, 114 gastric cancer patients and 87 healthy controls were enrolled. MMP-9 levels and activities were quantitatively measured by ELISA assay and zymography. The results were compared with the occurrence, clinicopathologic features, and outcomes of gastric cancer patients. The follow-up time for all patients was at least 5 years. Results: Serum MMP-9 levels were significantly higher than plasma MMP-9 levels. Both plasma and serum MMP-9 levels correlated significantly with active MMP-9 identified by zymography (P = 0.002 and P = 0.048, respectively). Plasma MMP-9 level was significantly elevated in gastric cancer patients when compared with control subjects (P < 0.001). Serum MMP-9 levels did not differ between the groups. Receiver-operator characteristics analysis showed the values of sensitivity (82.5%) and specificity (65.5%) at the maximum accuracy for plasma MMP-9 at >= 60 ng/mL (P < 0.001). Elevated plasma MMP-9 correlated significantly with lymph node metastasis [odds ratio (OR), 3.43; P = 0.019], lymphatic invasion (OR, 7.58; P = 0.009), and venous invasion (OR, 4.14; P = 0.033). Patients with elevated plasma MMP-9 levels had poorer survival rates than those with normal plasma MMP-9 levels (P = 0.038). Serum MMP-9 level did not correlate well with gastric cancer - invasive phenotypes or survival. Conclusion: Our results suggest plasma MMP-9 level is a better marker than serum MMP-9 level for predicting gastric cancer development and progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据