4.6 Article

On-line monitoring of end-tidal propofol concentration in anesthetized patients

期刊

ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 106, 期 4, 页码 659-664

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.anes.0000264745.63275.59

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Backgroung: Propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) has some volatility, so it can be detected in expired breath of individuals receiving intravenous propofol. This study measured volatile propofol exhaled by patients and investigated the relation between exhaled and plasma propofol concentrations. Methods: Nineteen patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or H who were undergoing elective surgery participated in this two-part study. in study 1 (n = 11), anesthesia was induced with 2 mg/kg propofol, 0.1 mg/kg vecuronium, and 2 mu g/kg fentanyl. After intubation, propofol was administered continuously for 60 min at each of three rates: 3, 6, and 9 mg center dot kg(-1) center dot h(-1). Blood samples were obtained just before each change in the infusion rate, and the plasma concentrations of propofol were measured. The exhaled propofol. concentration was measured continuously by means of proton transfer mass spectrometry. End-tidal propofol. concentrations during blood sampling were averaged and compared with plasma propofol concentrations. In study 2 (n = 8), after induction of anesthesia, patients received a bolus injection of 2 mg/kg propofol, and the exhaled propofol. concentration was measured. Results: Volatile propofol was detected in expired gas from all study patients. From study 1, the authors obtained 24 paired data points, i.e., concentrations of end-tidal and plasma propofol. With Bland-Altman analysis, bias precision was 5.2 +/- 10.4 with 95% limits of agreement of -15.1 and 25.6. In study 2, the exhaled propofol concentration curve showed an obvious peak in all patients. Conclusions: Agreement between plasma and exhaled propofol concentrations suggests that proton transfer mass spectrometry can be used for real-time propofol monitoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据