4.5 Article

Essential role of Peyer's patches in the development of Helicobacter-induced gastritis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 435-446

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/intimm/dxm008

关键词

CCR9 CD4(+) T cells; IFN-gamma production; migration; Peyer's patch-null mice

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Helicobacter bacteria colonize in the stomach and induce strong, specific local and systemic humoral and cell-mediated immunity. Helicobacter binds to the host epithelial cells, directly triggering the recruitment of neutrophils. Local inflammatory processes in the gastric mucosa are followed by extensive immune cell infiltration, resulting in chronic active gastritis characterized by a marked infiltration of T(h)1 cytokine-producing CD4(+) T cells. The mechanisms underlying the development of T(h)1 cell-mediated chronic gastritis, however, are not clear. Peyer's patches (PPs), the major inductive sites for mucosal immunity in the gut system, might orchestrate Helicobacter-specific local and systemic humoral and cell-mediated immunity. To examine the roles of PPs in the development of Helicobacter-induced gastritis, we generated PP-null mice that normally develop well-organized lymphoid organs except for PPs and intra-gastrically infected the resulting PP-null mice with Helicobacter felis. PP deficiency severely impaired both the development of T(h)1 cell-mediated gastritis induced by Helicobacter and the production of anti-Helicobacter antibodies despite marked bacterial colonization of the gastric mucosa. Although PP deficiency did not impair the differentiation of Helicobacter-specific CD4(+) T cells into IFN-gamma-producing T(h)1 cells, Helicobacter-specific IFN-gamma-producing CD4(+) T cells in PP-null mice lacked the ability to migrate into Helicobacter-colonized gastric mucosa. These findings suggest that PPs have an important role in Helicobacter-specific local and systemic humoral and cell-mediated immunity, including the development of Helicobacter-induced gastritis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据