4.7 Article

The association between changes in height and obesity in Chilean preschool children: 1996-2004

期刊

OBESITY
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 1012-1022

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2007.611

关键词

childhood obesity; growth; epidemiology; nutrition transition; stunting

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To establish the association between changes in height and prevalence of obesity between 1996 and 2004 in Chilean preschool children. Research Methods and Procedures: Children registered in the Junta Nacional de Jardines Infantiles (JUNJI) preschool program were routinely measured three times a year and in consecutive years. Two indices [weight-for-height z-scores (WHZ) and BMI centiles] were used to define obesity. Height-for-age z-scores (HAZ) were used to define stature. Generalized estimating equations were used to describe the relationship between stature and obesity while controlling for repeated measurements in children. Results: The prevalence of obesity in Chilean preschool children has remained relatively constant over the past 9 years when either index is used. The prevalence of stunted (HAZ <= 2) children has decreased, while the proportion of children who are tall (HAZ >2) has increased. Using WHZ to define obesity, stunted children do not seem to be at increased risk of obesity when compared with children of normal height. Tall children were strongly protected from obesity when either criterion was used to define obesity. Discussion: The lack of association between stunting and obesity using WHZ >= 2 likely reflects the fact that Chile is in the post-transitional phase of the nutrition transition, and stunting is no longer a risk factor for obesity; however, the associations observed between stunting and BMI suggest that either WHZ or BMI, or both, are inaccurate criteria to define overweight. Conclusions: There is a unique relationship between stature and obesity in preschool children that is different from that observed in older children in the same population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据