4.7 Article

Differences in phenotypic and genotypic traits against antimicrobial agents between Acinetobacter baumannii and Acinetobacter genomic species 13TU

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 633-639

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkm007

关键词

carbapenem resistance; metallo-beta-lactamases; beta-lactamases; A. baumannii

资金

  1. Korea Health Promotion Institute [A030076] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To investigate the differences in antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance mechanisms against imipenem between Acinetobacter baumannii and Acinetobacter genomic species 13TU. Methods: A total of 232 non-duplicate Acinetobacter species were consecutively collected from two Korean hospitals in Daegu, Republic of Korea, between November 2004 and November 2005. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by agar dilution methods. Resistance to imipenem was characterized by a carbapenemase activity test and PCR amplification. PFGE was performed to determine the clonal relatedness of imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter species. Results: A. baumannii was the most prevalent species (61.2%), followed by Acinetobacter genomic species 13TU (25.9%). The resistance rates of A. baumannii to most antimicrobial agents were higher than those of other Acinetobacter species, while the resistance rate to imipenem was the highest in Acinetobacter genomic species 13TU. Imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter genomic species 13TU isolates produced VIM-2 metallo-beta-lactamase, while imipenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates produced OXA-23 and/or OXA-51 p-lactamase. lmipenem-resistant Acinetobacter strains originated from different clones in each hospital. Conclusions: Two prevalent Acinetobacter species, A. baumannii and Acinetobacter genomic species 13TU, possess distinct phenotypic and genotypic traits against antimicrobials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据