4.7 Article

Serum interleukin-6 correlates with endothelial dysfunction in healthy men independently of insulin sensitivity

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 939-945

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc06-1793

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - Interleukin (IL)-6 is a proinflammatory cytokine that is implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and insulin resistance. Both endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance are among the earliest abnormalities that can be detected in people at risk for cardiovascular events. We aimed to evaluate whether increased serum IL-6 concentrations associated with endothelial dysfunction are independent of insulin sensitivity in apparently healthy men. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Association studies were performed in well-characterized nondiabetic Caucasian men (n = 99) recruited for energy balance studies. insulin sensitivity (minimal model) and brachial vascular reactivity (high-resolution external ultrasound) were assessed. Circulating IL-6 concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS - Serum IL-6 was an independent contributor to the variance of endothelium-dependent vasodilatation after adjusting for age, BMI, smoking status, LDL cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and insulin sensitivity (P = 0.001). In fact, circulating IL-6 was negatively associated with endothelium-dependent vasodilatation (r = -0.247, P = 0.014) and insulin sensitivity (r = -0.262, P = 0.011) and correlated positively with age (r = 0.241, P = 0.016), BMI (r = 0.240, P = 0.017), systolic blood pressure (r = 0.299, P = 0.003), diastolic blood pressure (r 0.295, P = 0.003), and triglycerides (r = 0.212, P = 0.035). No significant associations were observed between endothelium-independent vasodilatation and serum IL-6 concentrations. CONCLUSIONS - Circulating IL-6 is linked to endothelial dysfunction independently of insulin sensitivity in apparently healthy men.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据