4.8 Article

Preparation, characterization and in vitro cytotoxicity of paclitaxel-loaded sterically stabilized solid lipid nanoparticles

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 28, 期 12, 页码 2137-2146

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.014

关键词

paclitaxel; solid lipid nanoparticlcs; cancer; drug defivery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In an effort to develop an alternative formulation of paclitaxel suitable for parenteral administration, paclitaxel-loaded sterically stabilized solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) were prepared, charactcrized and examined for in vitro cytotoxicity. The SLNs, comprising trimyristin (TM) as a solid lipid core and egg phosphatidylcholine and pegylated phospholipid Lis stabilizers, were prepared using a hot homogenization method. Regardless of paclitaxel loading, the particle sizes and zeta potentials of the prepared SLNs were around 200 nm and -38 mV, respectively, suggesting that they would be suitable as a parenteral formulation. Cryo-scanning electron microscopy showed that the SLNs were homogeneous and spherical in shape, while differential scanning calorimetry measurement of the melting peak revealed that the TM exists as a solid ill our formulation. Paclitaxel was loaded to the solid cores at a w/w ratio of 6%. Gel column chromatography showed that paclitaxel co-eluted with the phospholipicis, indicating that paclitaxel was incorporated in the SLNs. An in vitro drug release study showed that paclitaxel was released from the SLNs in a slow but time-dependent manner. Furthermore, treatment of the OVCAR-3 human ovarian cancer cell line and the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line with paclitaxel-loaded SLNs yielded cytotoxicities comparable to those of a commercially available Crernophor EL-based paclitaxel formulation. These results collectively Suggest that our optimized SLN formulation may have a potential Lis alternative delivery system for parenteral administration of' paclitaxel. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据