4.6 Article

Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods

期刊

SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY
卷 56, 期 2, 页码 252-270

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1080/10635150701313830

关键词

ancestor reconstruction; comparative methods; estimated generalized least-squares; independent contrasts; maximum likelihood; morphometrics; principal components analysis; reduced major axis; regression; restricted maximum likelihood

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most phylogenetically based statistical methods for the analysis of quantitative or continuously varying phenotypic traits assume that variation within species is absent or at least negligible, which is unrealistic for many traits. Within-species variation has several components. Differences among populations of the same species may represent either phylogenetic divergence or direct effects of environmental factors that differ among populations (phenotypic plasticity). Within-population variation also contributes to within-species variation and includes sampling variation, instrument-related error, low repeatability caused by fluctuations in behavioral or physiological state, variation related to age, sex, season, or time of day, and individual variation within such categories. Here we develop techniques for analyzing phylogenetically correlated data to include within-species variation, or measurement error as it is often termed in the statistical literature. We derive methods for (i) univariate analyses, including measurement of phylogenetic signal, (ii) correlation and principal components analysis for multiple traits, (iii) multiple regression, and (iv) inference of functional relations, such as reduced major axis (RMA) regression. The methods are capable of incorporating measurement error that differs for each data point (mean value for a species or population), but they can be modified for special cases in which less is known about measurement error (e.g., when one is willing to assume something about the ratio of measurement error in two traits). We show that failure to incorporate measurement error can lead to both biased and imprecise (unduly uncertain) parameter estimates. Even previous methods that are thought to account for measurement error, such as conventional RMA regression, can be improved by explicitly incorporating measurement error and phylogenetic correlation. We illustrate these methods with examples and simulations and provide Matlab programs. [Ancestor reconstruction; comparative methods; estimated generalized least-squares; independent contrasts; maximum likelihood; morphometrics; principal components analysis; reduced major axis; regression; restricted maximum likelihood].

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据