4.6 Article

Mucolipidosis IV: Report of a case with ocular restricted phenotype caused by leaky splice mutation

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 143, 期 4, 页码 663-671

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.11.049

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

center dot PURPOSE: To confirm and define a molecular basis for a case of mucolipidosis type IV (ML IV) with an extremely atypical phenotype pattern. center dot DESIGN: Observational case report of a patient with ML IV with disease progression restricted to ocular symptoms. center dot METHODS: Complete ophthalmologic and neurologic examination. Ultrastructural examination of white blood cells, skin, conjunctiva, and corneal epithelium. The MCOLN1 gene was sequenced from cDNA and the proportion of splicing variants were assessed by quanti, tative allele-specific polymerase chain reaction. center dot RESULTS: Absence of any neurological abnormalities. Retinal pathologic features were the main cause of visual disability: low visual acuity and cloudy corneas since 2 years of age, progressive decrease in visual acuity since the age of 9 years. Ultrastructural examination showed storage lysosomes filled with either concentric membranes or lucent precipitate in corneal and conjunctive epithelia and in vascular endothelium. Cultured fibroblasts were free of any autofluorescence. Sequencing of the MCOLN1 gene identified compound heterozygosity for D362Y and A-T transition leading to the creation of a novel donor splicing site and a 4-bp deletion from exon 13 at the mRNA level. Both normal and pathologic splice forms were detected in skin fibroblasts and leukocytes, with the normal form being more abundant. center dot CONCLUSIONS. The case of this patient with ML IV is unique and is characterized by a curious lack of generalized symptoms. In this patient, the disorder was limited to the eyes and appeared without the usual psychomotor deterioration. The resulting phenotype is the mildest seentodate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据