4.7 Article

A plasmid-based reverse genetics system for animal double-stranded RNA viruses

期刊

CELL HOST & MICROBE
卷 1, 期 2, 页码 147-157

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2007.03.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [T32 CA009385, P30 CA68485, T32 CA09385, T32 CA009385-19, P30 CA068485-09, P30 CA068485] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [T32 AI049824-04, T32 AI007611-04, R37 AI038296, T32 AI07281, T32 AI049824, T32 AI49824, R01 AI032539-14, R01 AI32539, T32 AI007281, R01 AI038296, R01 AI038296-10, F32 AI071440, R37 AI038296-11, T32 AI007611, F32 AI071440-01, R01 AI032539-13, K08 AI062862-02, F32 AI71440, T32 AI07611, R01 AI032539, K08 AI062862, T32 AI007281-19, K08 AI62862, R37 AI38296] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK020593, P60 DK020593, P60 DK20593, P60 DK020593-28] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM008554-06, T32 GM008554, T32 GM007347, T32 GM07347, T32 GM08554, T32 GM007347-26, T32 GM007347-27] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mammalian orthoreoviruses (reoviruses) are highly tractable experimental models for studies of double-stranded (ds) RNA virus replication and pathogenesis. Reoviruses infect respiratory and intestinal epithelium and disseminate systemically in newborn animals. Until now, a strategy to rescue infectious virus from cloned cDNA has not been available for any member of the Reoviridae family of dsRNA viruses. We report the generation of viable reovirus following plasmid transfection of murine L929 (L) cells using a strategy free of helper virus and independent of selection. We used the reovirus reverse genetics system to introduce mutations into viral capsid proteins all and sigma 3 and to rescue a virus that expresses a green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgene, thus demonstrating the tractability of this technology. The plasmid-based reverse genetics approach described here can be exploited for studies of reovirus replication and pathogenesis and used to develop reovirus as a vaccine vector.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据