4.6 Article

Autosomal dominant optic atrophy:: Penetrance and expressivity in patients with OPA1 mutations

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 143, 期 4, 页码 656-662

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.12.038

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

center dot PURPOSE: We identified families with autosomal dominant optic atrophy (ADOA), determined the number and type of OPA1 mutations, and investigated the phenotypic variation and penetrance in ADOA Australian pedigrees. center dot DESIGN: Cross sectional genetics study. center dot METHODS: Probands were identified on the basis of characteristic clinical features of ADOA. We screened the OPA1 gene using single,strand conformational polymorphism, heteroduplex analysis (SSCP/HA), or by direct sequencing. Penetrance for pedigrees in which a mutation of OPA1 had been identified was calculated initially using all recruited individuals, and subanalysis was performed using only those families for which there was total recruitment of siblings. center dot RESULTS: A total of 406 patients from 17 pedigrees were recruited, and OPA1 mutations were identified in 11/17 (65%) of these. The mean age at clinical examination was 38.2 +/- 19.9 years (median age, 35 years; range, four to 83 years). The median best,corrected visual acuity in OPA1-mutation carriers was 20/70 (range, 20/16 to hand movements [HM]). The penetrance in Australian ADOA pedigrees in the families with complete sibling recruitment was 82.5%. On the other hand, overall penetrance for all individuals harboring an OPA1 mutation was 88%. center dot CONCLUSIONS: OPAI mutations were identified in 11/17 (65%) of the ADOA pedigrees in this study. The penetrance in our cohort was lower than originally described (82.5% vs 98%) but higher than some recent studies since the availability of genotyping. It is antici, pated that this figure would be even lower as more asymptomatic individuals are identified. There are likely to be other genetic and environmental modifiers influencing disease penetrance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据