4.6 Article

Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma -: a prognostic evaluation and correlation with hypoxia inducible factor 1α and vascular endothelial growth factor

期刊

ORAL ONCOLOGY
卷 43, 期 4, 页码 373-378

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2006.04.004

关键词

nasopharyngeal carcinoma; cyclooxygenase-2; hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha; vascular endothelial growth factor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cycloxygenase-2 (COX-2), hypoxia inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1 alpha) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) can be induced by the Epstein-Barr virus oncoprotein latent membrane protein-1 (LMP-1) in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) cell tines. This study examined the prognostic relevance of COX-2 and its relationship with HIF-1 alpha and VEGF expression in NPC biopsies. Primary tumor biopsies were obtained from 78 participants of a randomized trial who received radiotherapy (RT) with or without concurrent chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced NPC. These were analyzed for COX-2 expression and then correlated with age, sex, disease stage, treatment arm, survival and disease recurrence, VEGF and HIF-1 alpha expression in a regression model. 83% of tumors expressed COX-2, 47% co-expressed COX-2 and VEGF, 38% co-expressed COX-2 and HIF-1 alpha. On univariate analysis, COX-2 expression did not correlate with survival and recurrence, but moderate to high COX-2 expression was associated with advanced nodal stage (p = 0.03). Although univariate analysis showed that COX-2-HIF-1 alpha co-expression was associated with worse progression-free survival (p = 0.046), time to local (p = 0.004) and regional recurrence (p = 0.007), multivariate analysis failed to confirm any correlation between COX-2-HIF-1 alpha or COX-2-VEGF co-expression and survival or disease recurrence. Contrary to previous report, this study failed to demonstrate any prognostic significance of COX-2 expression alone or co-expression with HIF-1 alpha or VEGF in advanced NPC. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据