4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Tissue engineered cartilage bioshell protective layer for subcutaneous implants

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.11.025

关键词

tissue engineered cartilage; microtia reconstruction; external ear malformations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: One current technique to reconstruct an ear for microtia involves the use of a high density polyethylene auricular implant; however, the implant can extrude if not covered in a temporoparietal fascia flap. Theoretically, an autologous tissue engineered cartilage bioshell protective coating around a permanent biocompatible implant might reduce potential extrusion to avoid the flap requirement. We hypothesized that if Subjected to intentional exposure, a bioshell coating over an implant would provide enhanced wound heating. Methods: Six sheets of high density polyethylene and six sheets of 24 carat pure gold wire-mesh measuring 19 mm x 25 mm were implanted subcutaneously in an immunocompetent swine model. Half of each implant group were coated with chondrocytes (50-70 million cells/cm(3)) which were suspended in Pluronic F-127 30% hydrogel; the remaining implants without chondrocytes were used as controls. At 10 weeks postimplantation, partial implant exposure via excision of overlying skin was performed to simulate extrusion and the sites were allowed to heat secondarily. Results: All (6/6) of bioshell implants achieved wound closure after exposure by the seventh post-operative day; controls achieved closure at approximately 10 days. Bioshell neocartilage was evaluated and confirmed histologically using hematoxylin and eosin and safranin O stains. Histochemically, neocartilage approximated native cartilage with 60% glycosaminoglycans content. Conclusion: A 'proof-of-principle' tissue engineered bioshell around subcutaneous high density polyethylene and gold implants generated an elastic neocartilage coating, elicited a tow inflammatory reaction, and was associated with 30% faster wound heating. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据