4.6 Article

Plasma Volume Expansion with 5% Albumin Compared to Ringer's Acetate during Normal and Increased Microvascular Permeability in the Rat

期刊

ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 121, 期 4, 页码 817-824

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000363

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council, Stockholm, Sweden [11581]
  2. Medical Faculty of Lund University, Region Skane (ALF), Lund, Sweden
  3. Anna and Edwin Berger Foundation, Lidingo, Sweden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: It is believed that the effectiveness of colloids as plasma volume expanders is dependent on the endothelial permeability for macromolecules. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the plasma volume expanding effect of 5% albumin relative to that of a crystalloid solution is reduced if microvascular permeability is increased. Methods: A control group was resuscitated with either 5% albumin (8 ml/kg) or Ringer's acetate (36 ml/kg) immediately after a hemorrhage of 8 ml/kg (n = 29). In a second group, permeability was increased by inducing sepsis through cecal ligation and incision (n = 28). Three hours after cecal ligation and incision, the animals were resuscitated with either 5% albumin in a ratio of 1:1 relative to the volume of lost plasma, or Ringer's acetate in a ratio of 4.5:1. Results: In the hemorrhage group, plasma volumes at 15 min after resuscitation with albumin or Ringer's acetate had increased by 9.8 +/- 2.6 ml/kg (mean +/- SD) and 7.4 +/- 2.9 ml/kg and were similar at 2 and 4 h. Plasma volume 3 h after cecal ligation and incision had decreased by approximately 7 ml/kg, and at 15 min after resuscitation with albumin or Ringer's acetate it had increased by 5.7 +/- 2.9 and 2.4 +/- 3.0 ml/kg, respectively (P < 0.05). At 2 and 4 h after resuscitation, plasma volumes did not differ between the groups. Conclusion: This study does not support the hypothesis that the plasma-volume-expanding effect of albumin relative to that of crystalloids is decreased under conditions characterized by increased permeability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据