4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Complex expression pattern of Wnt ligands and frizzled receptors in human placenta and its trophoblast subtypes

期刊

PLACENTA
卷 28, 期 -, 页码 S97-S102

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2006.11.003

关键词

Wnt; frizzled; placenta; trophoblast; differentiation

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund FWF [P 17894] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Canonical Wingless (Writ) signalling provoked by exogenous and endogenous Writ ligands was recently shown to play a crucial role in the invasive differentiation of human trophoblasts. To gain insights into the expression pattern of the developmental regulators, we analysed all human Writ ligands and their Frizzled (FZD) receptors in the human placenta and different trophoblast model systems using semi-quantitative PCR. Fourteen out of 19 Writ ligands and 8 out of 10 FZD receptors were detectable in placental tissues, however, expression patterns varied with gestational age and between different trophoblast subtypes suggesting cell-specific functions. Besides Writ ligands acting through the canonical pathway, non-canonical ligands such as Wnt-5a, which may also activate alternative Writ signalling pathways or inhibit canonical Writ signalling, could be identified. Western blot analyses revealed secretion of Wnt-5a from primary trophoblast cultures and trophoblastic cell lines. To evaluate the potential role of Wnt-5a, SGHPL-5 trophoblast cells were transfected with luciferase reporter plasmids harbouring eight T-cell factor (TCF) DNA-recognition sequences which are exclusively activated through the canonical Writ signalling pathway. Luciferase assays revealed that Wnt-3a-induced reporter activity was repressed by recombinant Wnt-5a indicating an antagonistic role in trophoblasts. The data suggest that a complex network of Writ ligands and FZD receptors may regulate developmental processes of the human placenta. (c) 2007 Published by IFPA and Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据