4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes decrease the integrity of human blood-brain barrier endothelial cell monolayers

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 195, 期 7, 页码 942-950

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/512083

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR-00052] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R21 AI076798] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH063850] Funding Source: Medline
  4. PHS HHS [R01 A145774] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Central to the pathologic progression of human cerebral malaria (CM) is sequestration of Plasmodium falciparum-infected red blood cells (Pf-IRBCs) to the blood-brain barrier (BBB) endothelium. The molecular interactions between Pf-IRBCs and the BBB endothelium and their implications for barrier function are unclear. Methods. The effects of Pf-IRBCs on the integrity of the BBB were assessed by electrical cell substrate sensing and by transendothelial electrical resistance measurements in an in vitro human BBB model. In addition, Pf-IRBCs were subfractionated and treated with trypsin, artemisinin, or brefeldin A. Results. Pf-IRBCs, but not normal red blood cells, significantly decreased BBB resistance. Subfractionation showed that both membrane-associated and soluble Pf-IRBC factors mediate the decrease in BBB resistance. Trypsin treatment significantly reduced Pf-IRBC binding but not their ability to decrease electrical resistance. Likewise, P. falciparum isolates with increased binding to human brain microvascular endothelial cells did not alter the electrical resistance response. Soluble factors from Pf-IRBC culture supernatant decreased resistance by 50%-70% and precipitated with 40% ammonium sulfate saturation. Brefeldin-A partially blocked the ability of Pf-IRBCs to reduce resistance. Conclusion. The results suggest that, in CM, trypsin-resistant membrane components and soluble factors of Pf-IRBCs contribute to the impedance of BBB integrity in a multistep and multifactorial process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据