4.6 Article

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Postoperative Quality of Recovery Score The QoR-15

期刊

ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 118, 期 6, 页码 1332-1340

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital
  2. Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Quality of recovery (QoR) after anesthesia is an important measure of the early postoperative health status of patients. The aim was to develop a short-form postoperative QoR score, and test its validity, reliability, responsiveness, and clinical acceptability and feasibility. Methods: Based on extensive clinical and research experience with the 40-item QoR-40, the strongest psychometrically performing items from each of the five dimensions of the QoR-40 were selected to create a short-form version, the QoR-15. This was then evaluated in 127 adult patients after general anesthesia and surgery. Results: There was good convergent validity between the QoR-15 and a global QoR visual analog scale (r = 0.68, P < 0.0005). Construct validity was supported by a negative correlation with duration of surgery (r = -0.49, P < 0.0005), time spent in the postanesthesia care unit (r = -0.41, P < 0.0005), and duration of hospital stay (r = -0.53, P < 0.0005). There was also excellent internal consistency (0.85), split-half reliability (0.78), and test-retest reliability (r(i) = 0.99), all P < 0.0005. Responsiveness was excellent with an effect size of 1.35 and a standardized response mean of 1.04. The mean +/- SD time to complete the QoR-15 was 2.4 +/- 0.8 min. Conclusions: The QoR-15 provides a valid, extensive, and yet efficient evaluation of postoperative QoR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据