4.7 Article

Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 27, 期 14, 页码 3743-3752

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0519-07.2007

关键词

cognitive control; inferior frontal cortex; presupplementary motor area; subthalamic nucleus; tractography; stop signal

资金

  1. MRC [G0501316] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0501316] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G0501316] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to stop motor responses depends critically on the right inferior frontal cortex (IFC) and also engages a midbrain region consistent with the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Here we used diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) tractography to show that the IFC and the STN region are connected via a white matter tract, which could underlie a hyperdirect pathway for basal ganglia control. Using a novel method of triangulation analysis of tractography data, we also found that both the IFC and the STN region are connected with the presupplementary motor area (preSMA). We hypothesized that the preSMA could play a conflict detection/resolution role within a network between the preSMA, the IFC, and the STN region. A second experiment tested this idea with functional magnetic resonance imaging ( fMRI) using a conditional stop-signal paradigm, enabling examination of behavioral and neural signatures of conflict-induced slowing. The preSMA, IFC, and STN region were significantly activated the greater the conflict-induced slowing. Activation corresponded strongly with spatial foci predicted by the DWI tract analysis, as well as with foci activated by complete response inhibition. The results illustrate how tractography can reveal connections that are verifiable with fMRI. The results also demonstrate a three-way functional anatomical network in the right hemisphere that could either brake or completely stop responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据