4.4 Article

Effect of stem cell turnover rates on protection against cancer and aging

期刊

JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY
卷 245, 期 3, 页码 449-458

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.10.013

关键词

stem cells; tissue architecture; tissue design; cancer; aging; mathematical models; tradeoff; evolution; mathematical model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tissue stem cells are responsible for replenishing and maintaining a population of cells which make up a functioning organ. They divide by asymmetric cell division where one daughter remains a stem cell while the other daughter becomes a transit cell, which divides a defined number of times and differentiates. A fully differentiated cell has a finite life-span. A tissue can be maintained by various strategies. Stem cells can divide often and differentiated cells die often (fast turnover). Alternatively, stem cells can divide infrequently, and the differentiated cells are long lived (slow turnover). Genetic alterations and mutations can interfere with tissue homoeostasis. Mutations can induce senescence and apoptosis, and this can result in a reduction of the number of functioning tissue cells which could correlate with tissue aging. Alternatively, mutations can result in the carcinogenic transformation of cells and the formation of a tumour. Using mathematical models, I find that the cellular turnover rate affects the ability of genetic alterations to induce aging and the development of cancer. If mutations occur as a result of errors during cell division, the model suggests that a low cellular turnover rate protects both against aging and the development of cancer. On the other hand, if mutations occur independent from cell division (e.g. if DNA is hit by damaging agents), I find that a high cellular turnover rate protects against aging, while it promotes the development of cancer. Implications for optimal tissue design are discussed. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据