4.6 Article

STIM1 knockdown reveals that store-operated Ca2+ channels located close to sarco/endoplasmic Ca2+ ATPases (SERCA) pumps silently refill the endoplasmic reticulum

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 282, 期 15, 页码 11456-11464

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M609551200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stromal interaction molecule ( STIM) proteins are putative ER Ca2+ sensors that recruit and activate store-operated Ca2+ ( SOC) channels at the plasma membrane, a process triggered by the Ca2+ depletion of the endoplasmic reticulum ( ER). To test whether STIM1 is required for ER refilling, we used RNA interference and measured Ca2+ signals in the cytosol, the ER, and the mitochondria of HeLa cells. Knockdown of STIM1 ( mRNA levels, 73%) reducedSOCentry by 73% when sarco/ endoplasmic Ca2+ ATPases ( SERCA) were inhibited by thapsigargin but did not prevent Ca2+ stores refilling when cells were stimulated by physiological agonists. Stores could be fully refilled by increasing the external Ca2+ concentration above physiological values, but no cytosolic Ca2+ signals were detected during store refilling even at very high Ca2+ concentrations. [Ca2+](ER) measurements revealed that the basal activity of SERCA was not affected in STIM1 knockdown cells and that [ Ca2+](ER) levels were restored within 2 min in physiological saline following store depletion. Mitochondrial inhibitors reduced ER refilling in wild- type but not in STIM1 knockdown cells, indicating that ER refilling does not require functional mitochondria at low STIM1 levels. Our data show that ER refilling is largely preserved at reduced STIM1 levels, despite a drastic reduction of store- operated Ca2+ entry, because Ca2+ ions are directly transferred from SOC channels to SERCA. These findings are consistent with the formation of microdomains containing not only SOC channels on the plasma membrane and STIM proteins on the ER but also SERCA pumps and mitochondria to refill the ER without perturbing the cytosol.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据