4.6 Article

Effects of Crystalloid versus Colloid and the α-2 Agonist Brimonidine versus Placebo on Intraocular Pressure during Prone Spine Surgery A Factorial Randomized Trial

期刊

ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 116, 期 4, 页码 807-815

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182475c10

关键词

-

资金

  1. Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation (APSF)
  2. Deltex Medical (Irving, Texas)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Volume replacement with colloid solution and topical alpha-2 agonists may each moderate the progressive increase in intraocular pressure (TOP) during prone surgery. The authors tested the hypotheses that during prolonged prone surgery, IOP increases less with goal-directed intravenous administration of 5% albumin than with goal-directed administration of lactated Ringer's solution, and with topical alpha-2 agonist brimonidine than with placebo eye drops. Methods: Patients having complex prone spine surgery were factorially randomized to albumin and topical placebo (n = 15); albumin and topical brimonidine (n = 16); lactated Ringer's solution and topical placebo (n = 13); and lactated Ringer's solution and topical brimonidine (n = 16). IOP was measured with a pneumotonometer. The primary outcome was time-weighted average intraoperative IOP. Results: Prone positioning increased IOP a mean +/- SD of 12 +/- 6 mmHg. TOP increased to 38 +/- 10 mmHg at the end of anesthesia (approximately 5.5 h). Time- weighted average intraoperative TOP in the brimonidine group was 4 (95% CI: 1, 8) mmHg lower than in the placebo group (P = 0.023), but no different in the crystalloid and albumin groups (mean difference (95% CI) of -2 (-5, 2) mmHg (P = 0.34). There was no interaction between the two randomized factors. Conclusions: Brimonidine slightly reduced the primary outcome of intraoperative time-weighted average IOP, whereas there was no significant difference between goal-directed albumin or crystalloid administration. Brimonidine thus helps reduce IOP during spine surgery, but maintaining adequate blood pressure might play a more important role.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据