4.6 Article

μ-Opioid Receptor Gene A118G Polymorphism Predicts Survival in Patients with Breast Cancer

期刊

ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 116, 期 4, 页码 896-902

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31824b96a1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland [P50-CA58223]
  2. Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Preclinical studies suggest that opioids may promote tumor growth. Genetic polymorphisms have been shown to affect opioid receptor function and to modify the clinical effects of morphine. In this study we assessed the association between six common polymorphisms in the mu-opioid receptor gene, including the well known A118G polymorphism, and breast cancer survival. Methods: A total of 2,039 women ages 23-74 yr (38% African-American, 62% European-American, 55% postmenopausal) diagnosed with breast cancer between 1993-2001 were followed through 2006. Genotyping was performed using the TaqMan platform (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA). Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association between each genotype and survival. Results: After Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, patient genotype at A118G was associated with breast cancer-specific mortality at 10 yr. Women with one or more copies of the G allele had decreased breast cancer-specific mortality (P < 0.001). This association was limited to invasive cases only; effect size appeared to increase with clinical stage. Cox regression model adjusted for age and ethnicity also showed decreased mortality in A/G and G/G genotypes compared with A/A genotype (hazard ratio = 0.57 [0.38, 0.85] and 0.32 [0.22, 0.49], respectively; P = 0.006). Conclusions: These results suggest that opioid pathways may be involved in tumor growth. Further studies examining the association between genetic variants influencing opioid system function and cancer survival are warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据