4.7 Article

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor enhances bone tumor growth in mice in an osteoclast-dependent manner

期刊

BLOOD
卷 109, 期 8, 页码 3424-3431

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2006-09-048686

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P50 CA 94056, P50 CA094056, T32 CA 09547, P30 CA 091842, R01 CA097250, R01 CA 097250, P30 CA091842, T32 CA009547] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [T32 HL007088, T32 HL 007088] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK056341-06, DK 56341, DK 5634, P30 DK056341, P30 DK056341-07] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM 7200, T32 GM007200] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inhibition of osteoclast (OC) activity has been associated with decreased tumor growth in bone in animal models. Increased recognition of factors that promote osteoclastic bone resorption in cancer patients led us to investigate whether increased OC activation could enhance tumor growth in bone. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is used to treat chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, but is also associated with increased markers of OC activity and decreased bone mineral density (BMD). We used G-CSIF as a tool to investigate the impact of increased OC activity on tumor growth in 2 murine osteolytic tumor models. An 8-day course of G-CSF alone (without chemotherapy) significantly decreased BMD and increased OC perimeter along bone in mice. Mice administered G-CSF alone demonstrated significantly increased tumor growth in bone as quantitated by in vivo bioluminescence imaging and histologic bone marrow tumor analysis. Short-term administration of AMD3100, a CXCR4 inhibitor that mobilizes neutrophils with little effect on bone resorption, did not lead to increased tumor burden. However, OC-defective osteoprotegerin transgenic (OPG(Tg)) mice and bisphosphonate-treated mice were resistant to the effects of G-CSF administration upon bone tumor growth. These data demonstrate a G-CSF-induced stimulation of tumor growth in bone that is OC dependent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据