4.7 Article

ADAM-17 expression in breast cancer correlates with variables of tumor progression

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 2335-2343

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2092

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ADAMs are a family of membrane proteins possessing a disintegrin and metalloprotease domain. One of their main functions is shedding of membrane proteins. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that ADAM-17 (also known as tumor necrosis factor-a converting enzyme) is involved in breast cancer progression. Overexpression of ADAM-17 in MCF-7 breast cancer cells increased in vitro invasion and proliferation, whereas down-regulation of ADAM-17 expression in MDA-MB-435 cells decreased invasion and proliferation. At both mRNA and protein levels, ADAM-17 expression was significantly up-regulated in breast cancer compared with normal breast tissue. Using Western blotting, ADAM-17 protein in breast cancer was shown to exist in two forms migrating with approximate molecular masses of 100 and 120 kDa. Based on their known molecular mass, these bands were taken to represent the active and precursor forms of ADAM-17, respectively. The proportion of active to total ADAM-17 increased progressively from normal breast tissue to primary breast cancer to lymph node metastases (P = 0.017, Kruskal-Wallis test). In primary cancers, the active form was expressed more frequently in node-positive compared with node-negative tumors (P = 0.034, chi(2) test). Furthermore, in primary carcinomas, both forms of ADAM-17 correlated significantly (Spearman correlation analysis) with levels of urokinase plasminogen activator (precursor form: r = 0.246, P = 0.032, n = 83 and active form: r = 0.428, P = 0.0001, n = 83) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (precursor form: r = 0.524, P < 0.0001, n = 73 and active form: r = 0.365, P = 0.002, n = 73). Our results support the hypothesis that ADAM-17 is involved in breast cancer progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据