4.6 Article

Objective Assessment of the Immediate Postoperative Analgesia Using Pupillary Reflex Measurement A Prospective and Observational Study

期刊

ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 116, 期 5, 页码 1006-1012

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318251d1fb

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The evaluation of pain intensity during the immediate postoperative period is a key factor for pain management. However, this evaluation may be difficult in some circumstances. The pupillary dilatation reflex (PDR) has been successfully used to assess the analgesic component of a balanced anesthetic regimen. We hypothesized that PDR could be a reliable index of pain intensity and could guide morphine administration in the immediate postoperative period. Methods: One hundred patients scheduled to undergo general surgery were included in this prospective observational study. Pain intensity was assessed by using a simple five-item verbal rating scale (VRS). After patients awoke from general anesthesia, those experiencing mild or more severe pain (VRS more than 1) received intravenous morphine titration. Before and after intravenous morphine titration, the PDR induced by a standardized noxious stimulus was measured with a portable pupillometer. A receiver-operating curve was built to estimate the accuracy of PDR in objectively detecting patients requiring morphine titration. Results are given as median (95% CI). Results: On the initial evaluation, a correlation was found between VRS and PDR (rho = 0.88 [0.83-0.92], P < 0.0001). In the 39 patients that had a VRS more than 1, PDR before and after morphine titration was respectively 35% (31-43) versus 12% (10-14); P < 0.0001. The PDR threshold value corresponding to the highest accuracy to have VRS more than 1 was 23%, with 91% and 94% sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Conclusion: In the immediate postoperative period, the PDR is significantly correlated with the VRS. The pupillometer could be a valuable tool to guide morphine administration in the immediate postoperative period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据