4.6 Article

IL-7 is essential for the development and the persistence of chronic colitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 178, 期 8, 页码 4737-4748

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.8.4737

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although IL-7 has recently emerged as a key cytokine involved in controlling the homeostatic turnover and the survival of peripheral resting memory CD4(+) T cells, its potential to be sustained pathogenic CD4(+) T cells in chronic immune diseases, such as inflammatory bowel diseases, still remains unclear. In this study, we demonstrate that IL-7 is essential for the development and the persistence of chronic colitis induced by adoptive transfer of normal CD4(+)CD45RB(high) T cells or colitogenic lamina propria (LP) CD4(+) memory T cells into immunodeficient IL-7(+/+) x RAG-1(-/-) and IL-7(-/-) x RAG-1(-/-) mice. Although IL-7(+/+) x RAG-1(-/-) recipients transferred with CD4(+)CD45RB(high) splenocytes developed massive inflammation of the large intestinal mucosa concurrent with massive expansion of Th1 cells, IL-7(-/-) x RAG-1(-/-) recipients did not. Furthermore, IL-7(-/-) x RAG-1(-/-), but not IL-7(+/+) x RAG-1(-/-), mice transferred with LP CD4(+)CD44(high) CD62L(-)IL-7R alpha(high) effector-memory T cells (T-EM) isolated from colitic CD4(+)CD45RB(high)-transferred mice did not develop colitis. Although rapid proliferation of transferred colitogenic LP CD4(+) T-EM cells was observed in the in IL-7(-/-) x RAG-1(-/-) mice to a similar extent of those in IL-7(+/+) x RAG-1(-/-) mice, Bcl-2 expression was significantly down-modulated in the transferred CD4(+) T cells in IL-7(-/-) x RAG-1(-/-) mice compared with those in IL-7(+/+) x RAG-1(-/-) mice. Taken together, IL-7 is essential for the development and the persistence of chronic colitis as a critical survival factor for colitogenic CD4(+) T-EM cells, suggesting that therapeutic approaches targeting IL-7/IL-7R signaling pathway may be feasible in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据