4.8 Article

Three functional variants of IFN regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) define risk and protective haplotypes for human lupus

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701266104

关键词

interferon pathway; systemic lupus erythematosus

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR000052, M01 RR000079, 5 M01 RR-00079, M01-RR-00052] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [K02 AI052170, R56 AI057484, R01 AI049494] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR 43727, R01 AR043727] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Systematic genome-wide studies to map genomic regions associated with human diseases are becoming more practical. Increasingly, efforts will be focused on the identification of the specific functional variants responsible for the disease. The challenges of identifying causal variants include the need for complete ascertainment of genetic variants and the need to consider the possibility of multiple causal alleles. We recently reported that risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is strongly associated with a common SNP in IFN regulatory factor 5 (IRFS), and that this variant altered spicing in a way that might provide a functional explanation for the reproducible association to SLE risk. Here, by resequencing and genotyping in patients with SLE, we find evidence for three functional alleles of IRF5: the previously described exon 1B splice site variant, a 30-bp in-frame insertion/deletion variant of exon 6 that alters a proline-, glutamic acid-, serine- and threonine-rich domain region, and a variant in a conserved polyA+ signal sequence that alters the length of the 3'UTR and stability of IRFS mRNAs. Haplotypes of these three variants define at least three distinct levels of risk to SLE. Understanding how combinations of variants inf luence IRF5 function may offer etiological and therapeutic insights in SLE; more generally, IRF5 and SUE illustrates how multiple common variants of the same gene can together influence risk of common disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据