4.8 Article

DNA-nanotube-induced alignment of membrane proteins for NMR structure determination

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0700930104

关键词

dipolar couplings; nanotechnology; liquid crystal; scaffolded origami

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI067438, AI067438] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Membrane proteins are encoded by 20-35% of genes but represent < 1% of known protein structures to date. Thus, improved methods for membrane-protein structure determination are of critical importance. Residual dipolar couplings (RDCs), commonly measured for biological macromolecules weakly aligned by liquid-crystalline media, are important global angular restraints for NMR structure determination. For alpha-helical membrane proteins > 15 kDa in size, Nuclear-Overhauser effect-derived distance restraints are difficult to obtain, and RDCs could serve as the main reliable source of NMR structural information. In many of these cases, RDCs would enable full structure determination that otherwise would be impossible. However, none of the existing liquid-crystalline media used to align water-soluble proteins are compatible with the detergents required to solubilize membrane proteins. We report the design and construction of a detergent-resistant liquid crystal of 0.8-mu m-long DNA-nanotubes that can be used to induce weak alignment of membrane proteins. The nanotubes are heterodimers of 0.4-mu m-long six-helix bundles each self-assembled from a 7.3-kb scaffold strand and > 170 short oligonucleotide staple strands. We show that the DNA-nanotube liquid crystal enables the accurate measurement of backbone N-H and C alpha H alpha RDCs for the detergent-reconstituted xi-xi transmembrane domain of the T cell receptor. The measured RDCs validate the high-resolution structure of this transmembrane dimer. We anticipate that this medium will extend the advantages of weak alignment to NMR structure determination of a broad range of detergent-solubilized membrane proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据