4.7 Article

Bacopa monniera prevents from aluminium neurotoxicity in the cerebral cortex of rat brain

期刊

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 111, 期 1, 页码 56-62

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2006.10.037

关键词

Bacopa extract; 4-hydroxynonenol (4HNE); lipofuscin; superoxide dismutase (SOD); reduced glutathione (GSH); thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance (TBARS); glutathione peroxidase (GPx)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacopa monniera is a perennial herb, and is used as a nerve tonic in ayurveda, a traditional medicinal system in India. Aluminium-induced neurotoxicity is well known and different salts of aluminium have been reported to accelerate oxidative damage to biomolecules like lipids, proteins and nucleic acids. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether Bacopa monniera could potentially inhibit aluminium toxicity in the cerebral cortex. Male Wister rats (8 months old) were administered with AlCl3 orally at a dose of 50 mg/kg/day in drinking water for 1 month. Experimental rats were given AlCl3 along with Bacopa monniera extract at a dose of 40 mg/kg/day. One group of rats was treated with L-deprenyl at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day along with AlCl3 treatment. We have observed that Bacopa monniera prevented accumulation of lipid and protein damage significantly, which resulted from aluminium intake. Decline in the activity of endogenous antioxidant enzymes associated with aluminium administration was also inhibited by Bacopa monniera extract. The potential of Bacopa monniera to inhibit Al-induced oxidative stress was observed to be similar to that of L-deprenyl, which was taken as standard. The potential of Bacopa monniera extract to prevent alummium neurotoxicity was reflected at the microscopic level as well, indicative of its neuroprotective effects. These findings strongly implicate that Bacopa monniera has potential to protect brain from oxidative damage resulting from aluminium toxicity. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据