4.8 Article

The same genomic region conditions clonal deletion and clonal deviation to the CD8αα and regulatory T cell lineages in NOD versus C57BL/6 mice

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701777104

关键词

autoimmunity; FoxP3; tolerance

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R37 DK060027, DK 60027, R01 DK060027] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clonal deviation is a mechanism by which immature thymocytes expressing a self -reactive T cell antigen receptor (TCR) are rescued from clonal deletion by adopting an alternative differentiation pathway resistant to apoptosis. Here, we confirm and generalize previous indications that genetic alleles in NOD mice condition ineffective clonal deviation toward the CD8 alpha alpha lineage, a peculiar population of TCR alpha beta. lymphocytes that electively colonizes the intraepithelial lymphocyte pool in the gut. Thymic selection of CD8 alpha alpha cells was very age-dependent, occurring almost exclusively in the postnatal period. Fewer CD8 alpha alpha cells were found in the thymus and intraepithelial lymphocytes of BDC2.5 TCR transgenic mice on the NOD than on the C57BL/6 (B6) background; this paucity extended to standard NOD mice, albeit to a lesser extent. CD8 alpha alpha cells resided in the BDC2.5 pancreatic infiltrate, and they were more abundant on the B6 than the NOD background, correlating with aggressivity of the lesion. A (B6(g7) x NOD)F-2 intercross in agonist-challenged BDC2.5 fetal thymic organ cultures demonstrated the existence of a major quantitative trait locus on chromosome 3, coincident with an interval associated with resistance to clonal deletion. A replicate linkage confirmed these positions and showed that the same region also controls clonal deviation toward the CD4(+)FoxP3(+) regulatory T cell lineage. That clonal deviation toward the CD8 alpha alpha and regulatory T cell pathways share genetic control further highlights the similarities between these two rescue lineages, consistent with an immunoregulatory role for CD8 alpha alpha cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据