4.6 Article

Neostigmine/Glycopyrrolate Administered after Recovery from Neuromuscular Block Increases Upper Airway Collapsibility by Decreasing Genioglossus Muscle Activity in Response to Negative Pharyngeal Pressure

期刊

ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 113, 期 6, 页码 1280-1288

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f70f3d

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Reversal of residual neuromuscular blockade by acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (eg, neostigmine) improves respiratory function However, neostigmine may also impair muscle strength We hypothesized that neostigmine administered after recovery of the train-of-four (TOF) ratio impairs upper airway integrity and genioglossus muscle function Methods We measured, in 10 healthy male volunteers, epiglottic and nasal mask pressures, genioglossus electromyogram, air flow, respiratory timing, and changes in lung volume before, during (TOF ratio 0 5), and after recovery of the TOF ratio to unity, and after administration of neostigmine 0 03 mg/kg IV (with glycopyrrolate 0 0075 mg/kg) Upper airway critical closing pressure (Pcrit) was calculated from flow-limited breaths during random pharyngeal negative pressure challenges Results Pcrit increased significantly after administration of neostigmine/glycopyrrolate compared with both TOF recovery (mean +/- SD, by 27 +/- 21%, P = 0 02) and baseline (by 38 +/- 17%, P = 0 002) In parallel phasic genioglossus activity evoked by negative pharyngeal pressure decreased (by 37 +/- 29%, P = 0 005) compared with recovery, almost to a level observed at a TOF ratio of 0 5 Lung volume, respiratory timing, tidal volume, and minute ventilation remained unchanged after neostigmine/glycopyrrolate injection Conclusion Neostigmine/glycopyrrolate when administered after recovery from neuromuscular block, increases upper airway collapsibility and impairs genioglossus muscle activation in response to negative pharyngeal pressure Reversal with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors may be undesirable in the absence of neuromuscular blockade

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据