4.6 Article

A Comparison of Change in the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale to a Pain Relief Scale and Global Medication Performance Scale in a Short-term Clinical Trial of Breakthrough Pain Intensity

期刊

ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 112, 期 6, 页码 1464-1472

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181de0e6d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cephalon Inc., West Chester, Pennsylvania
  2. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland [R01 CA73797]
  3. Pfizer, Inc., New York, New York
  4. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania
  5. Pharmacia, Kalamazoo, Michigan
  6. Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, Indiana
  7. Glaxo Smith Kline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Pain intensity is commonly reported using a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale in pain clinical trials. Analysis of the change on the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale as a proportion has most consistently correlated with clinically important differences reported on the patient's global impression of change. The correlation of data from patients with breakthrough pain with a Pain Relief Scale and a different global outcomemeasures will extend our understanding of these measures. Methods: Data were obtained from the open titration phase of a multiple crossover, randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate with immediate-release oral morphine sulfate for the treatment of cancer-related breakthrough pain. Raw and percentage changes in the pain intensity scores from 1,307 episodes of pain in 134 oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate-naive patients were correlated with the clinically relevant secondary outcomes of Pain Relief Verbal Response sponse Scale and the global medication performance scale. The changes in raw and percentage change were assessed over time and compared with the ordinal Pain Relief Verbal Response Scale and Global Medication Performance Scale. Results: The P value of the interaction between the raw pain intensity difference was significant (P = 0.034) for four 15-min time periods but not for the percentage pain intensity difference score (P = 0.26). We found similar results in comparison with the ordinal Pain Relief Verbal Response Scale (P = 0.0048 and P = 0.36 respectively) and global medication performance categories (P = 0.048 and P = 0.45, respectively). Conclusion: The change in pain intensity in breakthrough pain was more consistent over time and when compared with both the Pain Relief Verbal Response Scale and the Global Medication Performance Scale when the percentage change is used rather than raw pain intensity difference.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据