4.2 Article

Skewed X-chromosome inactivation is associated with primary but not secondary ovarian failure

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
卷 143A, 期 9, 页码 945-951

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31679

关键词

premature ovarian failure; X chromosome inactivation; chromosome deletion amenorrhea; DNA microarray; menopause; mosaicism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Premature ovarian failure (POF) is the occurrence of menopause before the age of 40, and may present with either primary or secondary amenorrhea. Numerous cases of POF in women with X-chromosome deletions or translocations have been reported; thus, it is possible that smaller rearrangements undetectable by conventional cytogenetics may contribute to POF in some patients. In females with an abnormal X chromosome, cells with inactivation of the normal X may be selected against, causing skewed X-chromosome inactivation (XCI). We therefore assessed XCI by methylation sensitive restriction digestion and PCR amplification at the androgen receptor (AR) locus, in 4 primary and 55 secondary POF patients and 109 control women. In samples heterozygous at AR and therefore informative for the skewing assay, the frequency of skewed XCI among the women with secondary amenorrhea was identical to that in control women, with 4 out of 48 (8.3%) secondary ovarian failure patients and 8 out of 97 (8.2%) control women having >= 90% skewing. Notably, all three primary amenorrhea patientsthat were informative at AR had skewed XCI >= 90% (P = 0.001 vs. control women Fisher's exact test). To investigate whether X-chromosome copy number alterations were responsible, DNA from selected patients with skewed XCI was examined by high resolution DNAmicroarray, however no potential regions of DNA addition or deletion were confirmed by FISH or PCR. X-chomosome abnormalities undetectable by array, or reduced follicular pool due to an early trisomic rescue event, may explain the skewed XCI observed in POF patients presenting with primary amenorrhea. (C) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据