4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Thalamic Microinfusion of Antibody to a Voltage-gated Potassium Channel Restores Consciousness during Anesthesia

期刊

ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 110, 期 4, 页码 766-773

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819c461c

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The Drosophila Shaker mutant fruit-fly, with its malfunctioning voltage-gated potassium channel, exhibits, anesthetic requirements that are more than twice normal. Shaker mutants with all abnormal Kv1.2 channel also demonstrate significantly reduced sleep. Given the important role the thalamus plays in both sleep and arousal, the authors investigated whether localized central medial thalamic (CMT) microinfusion of all antibody designed to block the pore of the Kv1.2 channel might awaken anesthetized rats. Methods: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with a cannula aimed at the CMT or lateral thalamus. One week later, unconsciousness was induced with either desflurane (3.6 +/- 0.2%; n = 55) or sevoflurane (1.2 +/- 0.1%; n = 51). Arousal effects of a single 0.5-mu 1 infusion of Kv1.2 potassium channel blocking antibody (0.1-0.2 mg/ml) or a control infusion of Arc-protein antibody (0.2 mg/ml) were then determined. Results: The Kv1.2 antibody, but not the control antibody, temporarily restored consciousness in 17% of all animals and in 75% of those animals where infusions occurred within the CMT (P < 0.01 for each anesthetic). Lateral thalamic infusions showed no effects. Consciousness returned on average (+/- SD) 170 +/- 99 s after infusion and lasted a median time of 398 s (interquartile range: 279-510 s). Temporary seizures, without apparent consciousness, predominated in 33% of all animals. Conclusions: These findings support the idea that the CMT plays a role in modulating levels of arousal during anesthesia and further suggest that voltage-gated potassium channels ill the CMT may contribute to regulating arousal or may even be relevant targets of anesthetic action.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据