4.8 Article

Effect Of Pt/TiO2 characteristics on temporal behavior of o-cresol decomposition by visible light-induced photocatalysis

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 10, 页码 2069-2078

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.02.021

关键词

photocatalysis; platinum; titanium dioxide; o-cresol; visible light

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Platinum deposited TiO2 films were prepared on quartz substrates by dip-coating process for the photodecomposition. of o-cresol. The characteristics of Pt/TiO2 and the temporal behavior of o-cresol decomposition by Pt/TiO2 photocatalysis under visible light irradiation were investigated. Platinum deposited on TiO2 photocatalysts was characterized by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area measurement, X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), diffuse reflectance UV-Vis spectra (DRS) and photoluminescence (PL) emission spectra. The results indicated that the deposition of platinum on TiO2 promoted the optical absorption in the visible region and made it possible to be excited by visible light. The decomposition rate ofo-cresol under visible light irradiation from a fluorescent lamp was enhanced to noticeably extents for experiments conducted with Pt/TiO2 containing platinum up to 0.50wt% platinum because of the presence of Ti3+ resulted from the platinum deposited on the TiO2 surface; and the formation of Schottky Barrier between platinum and TiO2 preventing the recombination of electric holes and electrons. Specifically, the reaction rate of o-cresol photodegradation at pH 9 using the 0-50 Wt% Pt/TiO2 was 4.8 times than that of using pure TiO2. The intermediates identified by GC/MS spectroscopy during the photocatalytic oxidation of o-cresol. The proposed kinetic model could be adequately applied to describe the temporal behavior of the o-cresol decomposition with and without the dosage of Pt on TiO2 in aqueous solution by UV/TiO2 process. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据